From Researcher to Research Leader

Reflections from Forecasting for Social Good

Bahman Rostami-Tabar

Data Lab for Social Good, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University

An Unexpected Journey

I lead an active research group with around 12 PhD students, collaborating with:

  • Government partners & WHO
  • NHS Trusts
  • Ministries of health across several African countries

Looking back, the journey from uncertain lecturer to research leader did not happen through a grand strategy.

A Moment That Changed My Perspective

A few years ago, I visited a health centre in West Africa.

  • The shelves were empty
  • No contraceptives
  • No essential medicines

At first glance, it looked like a logistics problem. But the real issue wasn’t manufacturing or transportation — it was forecasting.

Planners simply didn’t have reliable tools to anticipate demand.

A Realisation

Standing there changed how I thought about research. Until then, I had been doing what many of us do:

  • Publishing papers
  • Improving forecasting models
  • Developing new methods

But the real problem was not a lack of models.

The real problem was a lack of translation between research and decision-making.

A Question That Stayed With Me

How can forecasting research actually help people make better decisions under uncertainty?

That question eventually led to Forecasting for Social Good.

The Shift

Solving these problems wasn’t going to happen through one paper, one model, or one project.

It required partnerships with:

  • Ministries & NGOs
  • Health systems
  • Researchers across different countries

And that meant my role had to change.

Becoming Something Else

I realised I was no longer just a researcher. I had to become something else:

  • A research organiser
  • A collaborator and bridge-builder
  • Sometimes a trainer
  • Sometimes a fundraiser

What started as a research idea became a programme combining research, collaboration, and training across multiple countries.

Following Curiosity and Values

Looking back, I wasn’t following research trends. Instead, I was following:

  • Curiosity
  • Values
  • Problems that genuinely interested me

The gap between forecasting research and real decisions fascinated me. The idea that research could empower people to make better decisions excited me.

Lesson 1: The Model Is Not the Centre of the Story

As researchers we are trained to optimise models. But in real systems:

  • Organisations care about usability
  • Practitioners care about trust
  • Decision-makers care about practicality

A slightly simpler model that people actually use can be far more valuable than the perfect model that sits in a paper.

Lesson 2: Impact Moves at a Different Speed

Academic success often moves fast: papers, citations, outputs.

Real-world impact moves differently. It requires:

  • Trust
  • Relationships
  • Patience

Some of the most impactful work I’ve done took years before producing a paper — and sometimes it produced no paper at all, but it changed practice.

Lesson 3: People Are the Most Scalable Impact

At first I thought impact would come from better models. But over time I realised:

The most scalable form of impact is people.

If you train analysts and practitioners, they will continue applying those skills long after a project ends.

Sometimes the most powerful thing a researcher can do is build capability.

The Uncomfortable Reality

There is also a less visible side to research leadership. The more successful a programme becomes:

  • The less time you spend coding
  • The more time you spend coordinating
  • The more time you spend writing grants

At first this felt like moving away from research. But leadership means enabling knowledge, not just producing it.

A Provocation

Many societal challenges require collaborative research ecosystems.

But academic systems still reward mostly individual outputs.

How do we build academic careers that reward building ecosystems and capacity, not just producing papers?

Final Reflection

Moving from researcher to research leader is not about becoming more important.

It’s about making your research less about you — and more about the problem you’re trying to solve.